Introduction

I take much too long to make (even easy) decisions. This has happened while picking which camera to buy, which gym to join, and even which dessert to eat. But when it came to determining which hosting plan to use, I took it a step further. I spent a couple of evenings researching storage limitations, hosting options, server locations, and pricing. 

I found myself asking the same question almost every time: SiteGround or Bluehost?

To be truthful, it wasn't a simple decision, since each hosting company has its own set of benefits. I've compiled my research and learning here to save you from sleepless hours trying to find out which service is best for you.

I'll also inform you of my decision (and why).

Let's get this party started!

How to earn up to 50% Commission: Click here

SiteGround vs Bluehost: Who Wins in 2020?

SiteGround (starting at $14.99) is a better option than Bluehost (starting at $8.99). SiteGround's customer service is more prompt, their performance (speed and uptime) is better, and they provide a more comprehensive range of services (e.g. staging area and speed optimization options). 



 SiteGround Bluehost
Popularity Medium High
Ease of use Great Good
Hosting features A lot Some
Speed Great Disappointing
Uptime Great Good
Server locations 6 1
Site migration Paid extra Paid extra
Scalability Good Good
Security Secure Secure
Support Good OK
Prices Medium-high Medium-low
Conclusion SiteGround’s performance is impressive, comes with a lot of hosting features and responsive support. However, they are a bit more expensive. Bluehost offers more storage and lower prices. But their performance is weak and their support not the greatest.  

 

SiteGround vs Bluehost – Which one is the most popular?

Bluehost, which was founded in Utah in 2003, now hosts over 2 million websites and employs over 750 people. Since they originally started, it hasn't stopped increasing. In 2010, EIG, a firm that operates a number of other web hosting providers (such as HostGator or iPage), chose to purchase it, and many believe this is when things began to go wrong.


 SiteGround was created in 2004 and now employs over 500 people while hosting over 2 million domain names. In recent years, this Bulgarian firm has managed to become one of the most popular shared hosting providers — we'll explain why below.


Popularity and hosting, on the other hand, rarely go together. Many large hosting companies, such as Bluehost, have trouble handling large numbers of clients. This hurts their performance as well as the quality of their support (lesson learned: don't take on more than you can handle.)

Ease of use – Which one is more straightforward?

Bluehost offers a cPanel-based solutions with a lot of common features (e.g., FTP accounts, a file manager, email accounts and PHPMyAdmin). However, SiteGround has their own custom panel that is more powerful and intuitive.

You can even enable CloudFlare (a popular CDN) easily with both providers.

SiteGround's approach is, in my opinion, a little cleaner. Bluehost's backend, which is a bespoke cPanel version, is simple and intuitive to use. It is, however, overloaded with continual upsell pitches and advertising of (paid) solutions that you are unlikely to require (e.g., AppMachine, Weebly, ConstantContact, and so on) — this may be confusing.

Another thing that irritates me with Bluehost is that their pricing is a little murky, and they attempt to get you to sign up for extended periods of time (3 years).

Winner: Both have a user-friendly interface and are quite intuitive. If I had to choose a winner, I'd go with SiteGround because Bluehost is a little pushy and their pricing is a little perplexing. 

For More Detail Click Here

For Watching Video Click Here 

50 % off from Bluehost Click Here 

For Reading Authentic Article Click Here 

Little More about Debounce To Earn Money Online